[ipv6-tf] “marketing phase” of IPv6 is left behind

[Bartek Gajda]

My tu myslimy o PROMOCJI IPV6, a swiat juz poszedl dalej i pracuje nad
wdrozeniami!

Ciekawy (miejscami:) artykul z networkworld.com:
kilka cytatow:

We have left behind what might be called the “marketing phase” of IPv6;
most everyone in the IP networking world now understands that IPv6 is
inevitable. Network operators (starting in the latter half of last year)
are now focused on how to best implement IPv6; large portions of the
agendas at NANOG, RIPE, and APRICOT have been devoted to strategy sharing.


oraz o mijajacym memorandum na zgodnosc z IPv6  agencji w USA

In the years between that mandate and the deadline, however, the
language and requirements slipped significantly.
The language moved from requiring that all purchased networking
equipment be “IPv6 compliant” to “IPv6 capable,” because agencies could
not come to a reliable and consistent definition of what “compliant”
meant. In fact some agencies even had trouble defining what
“infrastructure” meant.
;)

2008 was sort of a milestone year for IPv6.
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/36341?nlhtarch=rn_121608&nladname=121608networkarchitectureal

pozdrawiam,
Bartek